Research Article
The investigation of the military history and its historical implications of the war of Unification Three Kingdoms
국민대학교
Published: January 2024 · Vol. 33 · pp. 1-23
Full Text
Abstract
This study outlines the significance of the military historical ancient temple of the upheaval of the Three Kingdoms and the unification war of the Three Kingdoms in the late 7th century. In Chapter Ⅱ, we looked at the general view of military and military history, and in Chapter Ⅲ, we looked at the historical significance of military history by military historical considerations, and in Chapter 3, we looked at the meaning of military historical considerations of the Three Kingdoms War.
As the winner of the Three Kingdoms Unification War and the Silla-Tang War, he examined Silla's national power, Silla's army and naval forces, strategies and tactics, and proved that Silla was firmly established as the winner of history. In addition, the limitations of current military history research were also mentioned to give a balanced view. Through the study, we hope that we will not only expand our understanding of military history, but also deepen our understanding of the historical significance of the Three Kingdoms War and the unification of the Three Kingdoms.
It is often said that human history is the history of war. Korean history is no exception, and numerous war-related records handed down in “The Three Kingdoms' History” prove this. In this respect, East Asia in the 7th century was a century of war, and we were at the center of history as parties to such wars. These include the Goguryeo-Sui War, the Goguryeo-Tang War, the Unification War of the Three Kingdoms, and the Nadang War. The meaning of such a war has been examined early on, and historical significance and limitations have been presented.
Although the historical significance of the Three Kingdoms Unification War, which is the biggest turning point in Korean ancient history, has been suggested, it has become a common view that not only historical scholars but also the general public sympathize with it.
However, apart from such historical perceptions, the process of consideration remains unsatisfactory. This is because, despite the fact that the War of the Three Kingdoms was a war comparable to the modern world war, there is a lack of direct access to military history centered on the history of the war. Therefore, in order to properly recognize the history of the three countries on the Korean Peninsula and the East Asian world in the 7th century, precise military historical considerations must be conducted. This can be said to be the fundamental significance of military historical considerations.
As the winner of the Three Kingdoms Unification War and the Silla-Tang War, he examined Silla's national power, Silla's army and naval forces, strategies and tactics, and proved that Silla was firmly established as the winner of history. In addition, the limitations of current military history research were also mentioned to give a balanced view. Through the study, we hope that we will not only expand our understanding of military history, but also deepen our understanding of the historical significance of the Three Kingdoms War and the unification of the Three Kingdoms.
It is often said that human history is the history of war. Korean history is no exception, and numerous war-related records handed down in “The Three Kingdoms' History” prove this. In this respect, East Asia in the 7th century was a century of war, and we were at the center of history as parties to such wars. These include the Goguryeo-Sui War, the Goguryeo-Tang War, the Unification War of the Three Kingdoms, and the Nadang War. The meaning of such a war has been examined early on, and historical significance and limitations have been presented.
Although the historical significance of the Three Kingdoms Unification War, which is the biggest turning point in Korean ancient history, has been suggested, it has become a common view that not only historical scholars but also the general public sympathize with it.
However, apart from such historical perceptions, the process of consideration remains unsatisfactory. This is because, despite the fact that the War of the Three Kingdoms was a war comparable to the modern world war, there is a lack of direct access to military history centered on the history of the war. Therefore, in order to properly recognize the history of the three countries on the Korean Peninsula and the East Asian world in the 7th century, precise military historical considerations must be conducted. This can be said to be the fundamental significance of military historical considerations.
